Vital Elements In Intelligence News Around The Uk

In the end, in a day and time whenever we can generally find out about major events on Twitter before any of the news channels report them, why would we ever need pay for access to their content?

However, I'd, and frequently do, purchase quality and 'luxurious' news. I would never pay a penny for one of the shrinking amount of totally free Russia News newspapers passed out on my method to function in a early morning, but I'd purchase a Sunday broadsheet with all its extras and trimmings (even though the probability of me actually reading more than a few pages are really small).

I have been known to sign up to a paid people' area on the site of a certain football team (which shall remain nameless) to get access to extra content unavailable on the primary internet site: video interviews and press conferences, highlights of reserve and youth group matches, live radio commentary on match times.

Would I spend to read The Sun online? No. There are often only about 2 paragraphs in each image-dominated content anyway. It just costs a couple of pennies to buy the real thing therefore there wouldn't become much value in using its site. THE DAYS? Probably, but only if all other quality news outlets beginning charging, otherwise I'd simply choose the totally free one.

Utilizing a Credit Card pertaining to a 20p Content?

I'm uncertain how much Mr Murdoch really wants to charge his users to learn articles, but I'm guessing there is likely to be some kind of accounts that needs setting up. I certainly couldn't become bothered to get my wallet out every time I wished to learn something and I would be extremely hesitant to invest in subscribing.

However, if they had an identical program to iTunes, whereby you merely get into your password to gain access to a paid article and your card is billed accordingly, that might make a bit more feeling. But, if I had to achieve that for every major news company, it could become extremely tiresome.

Ultimately, they may be shooting themselves in the foot somewhat. If the site makes it harder and less hassle-free for me to read articles, I'll most likely go elsewhere. I'd assume that I would always be able to browse the news free of charge on the BBC's site, which would not be good news for the advertising revenue of the Murdoch online empire.

Copycats

Let's assume that I in fact wished to read an article on a paid site so badly that I handed over my credit cards information to them, what might stop me personally 'reporting' upon what this article said upon my freely available blog? I would imagine it could be very hard for a newspaper group to avoid a large number of bloggers disseminating the information freely to their users who gain lots of traffic in the process.

Recipe for Achievement?

The success or failure of paid news is in the method used to charge and engage with users, let's assume that the users value this content highly enough to deem it worth paying for. The jury is certainly still from the entire concept and the probabilities are that many will attempt and fail before a rewarding system is developed.